Day five is going to be pulled directly from the page because it is very fact heavy, talking about an Incident Within an Incident involving an airtanker drop fatality. So, without further ado, please join us.
“The Incident: August 13th, 2018 was the 11th
day for a Utah Multi-Agency Taskforce and their Taskforce Leader (TFLD) on the
Ranch Fire, a fire within the Mendocino Complex. During the morning operational
briefing, the TFLD, his Utah Multi-Agency Taskforce, and a Strike Team of
engines were assigned to Branch I, Division Charlie. After the briefing,
division resources headed out to the line to reinforce dozer line and support
it with a hose lay for an upcoming firing operation.
At approximately 1300 with increased fire activity,
airtankers were ordered to support Division Charlie of the Mendocino Complex.
Division/Group Supervisor (DIVS) Charlie requested to drop retardant adjacent
to the dozer line. Coordination of the operation between DIVS Charlie, Air
Attack, and the Aerial Supervision Module (ASM) was established. At
approximately 1540, DIVS Charlie told DIVS Charlie (T) that “Airtankers will be
working in the area.” That message on the division’s tactical frequency was
acknowledged and subsequently broadcast to “clear the area out” to the rest of
the division. Only one Strike Team Leader acknowledged hearing the message.
After three airtanker drops were completed between 1600 and
1700 with the last drop being too far from the dozer line, DIVS Charlie
requested the next drop to be “snugged up” and closer to the dozer line. The
ASM acknowledged the request and performed a “show me” flight for the Very
Large Airtanker (VLAT) to see the intended drop path and altitude. At
approximately 1725, the ASM and VLAT circled back around and initiated their
final approach. Obscured by vegetation, a rise in the terrain was directly
along the proposed drop location resulting in the retardant being dropped
approximately 100 feet above the canopy instead of the predicted 250 feet above
canopy. The lower altitude and force of the drop uprooted an 87-foot tall
Douglas Fir that struck the TFLD causing fatal injuries. Three other
firefighters were struck by falling debris and suffered moderate to major
injuries. Within seconds, an Incident Within an Incident was declared and
patient care was established.
The Response: After the tree strike an IWI was
declared, and Advanced Life Support (ALS) responders provided care and
transported four patients to the hospital for further treatment.
- The
Task Force Leader suffered fatal crushing injuries from the tree strike.
- One
Fire Captain suffered broken ribs, deep muscle contusions, and ligament
damage to extremities.
- One
Fire Captain suffered scratches and abrasions.
- One
Fire Apparatus Engineer suffered deep muscle contusions and ligament
damage.”
If you would like more resources, please click here.
As usual we have some discussion questions. Please feel free to talk about it
in the comments section or take home to your unit.
- Recognition
and communication about the upcoming airtanker drops were only
acknowledged by one Strike Team Leader, what else could have been done to
ensure everyone was situationally aware of the operations and potential
hazards?
- Imagine
becoming the IWI IC, what are you thinking and what are your first
actions?
- Imagine
being the only first responder to provide care, which patient needs your
attention first?
- Have
you practiced filling out the Medical Incident Report and communicating it
for multiple patients? What resources are needed for this IWI? Does a
fatality change that process?
No comments:
Post a Comment